We decide what artistic endeavour passed approval to earn the Scorcher label from the past seven days & what also had the dishonour of being that week's Torture...
It feels like I keep bringing up Western's in this section, both good and bad!
I was tempted to include the Absolutely Fabulous movie but realised it would have been for purely sentimental reasons. It really isn't that great a film but it did bring back a lot of nostalgia for a much loved British comedy. Instead we do have something darkly humorous tickling my fancy this week.
The ScorcherI was tempted to include the Absolutely Fabulous movie but realised it would have been for purely sentimental reasons. It really isn't that great a film but it did bring back a lot of nostalgia for a much loved British comedy. Instead we do have something darkly humorous tickling my fancy this week.
Finding the right balance in a horror comedy is not an easy task. Too much comedy and it can become parody. Too much horror and the comedy can feel like it has been shoehorned in. Having just watched season one of Scream Queens I can confidently say that Ryan Murphy, Brad Falchuk and Ian Brennan have found the right combination.
This show has some great comic moments spread through every episode. The horror doesn't go for gore but instead shoots for the Scream film franchise level of surprise horror. In fact I would bet that particular film franchise heavily influenced the tone of this series.
The Red Devil killer definitely shares some of the same traits as the Ghostface killer from Scream as they are both equally inept when it comes to attacking their victim. I would also suggest that the costume of the Red Devil killer took a little inspiration from Ghostface too; both using a mask to conceal the identity of the murderer.
Emma Roberts is particularly nasty in her role as the leader of the Chanel's. This is an obvious tribute to Heathers; naming the four sorority girls of Kappa Kappa Tau all Chanel. The overall tone of the show shares so much in common with Heathers actually, in a good way. In Roberts they couldn't have picked a better leading lady; she seems so genuine when dishing out her brutal lines.
Snagging Jamie Lee Curtis who is truly one of the original iconic Scream Queens is a real coup. She is terrific as the bitchy dean of the campus. She shows her comic chops, as well as returning to her horror roots, although this time around she isn't the type of girl to run away in high heels!
If there is one character that I could pick out who has the best lines it would have to be the completely naïve, sexually perverted: Chad Radwell. Nearly everything that comes out of his mouth is comedy gold and Glen Powell nails his performance. Equally amusing and just as welcome every time she appears is Niecy Nash as Denise Hemphill; the security guard out to protect the members of Kappa Kappa Tau.
I will say that this isn't a show that you should binge watch. To get the most benefit I feel it is a show where you need to view one, possibly two episodes at a time; otherwise it loses some of its appeal. The humour is great but in smaller doses and watching them one after another kind of dulls your senses and some of the smarter, quick witted jokes will pass you by.
The story itself keeps you guessing as to who the murderer is. This is one busy killer; barely an episode goes by without someone being done away with; and in some rather inventive ways. I have a confession to make: I was unable to solve the mystery of who was the main culprit. Yes I failed as an Inquisitor in this instance and I have dutifully been punishing myself with self-flagellation since!
The Torture
Well a second entry in the Torture category for a Matthew McConaughey film! I like Mr McConaughey but I am afraid that Free State of Jones did not live up to my expectations. Being a fan of the Western I was looking forward to this with eager anticipation. I especially love films about the American Civil War and the premise of this intrigued me.This film ended up being just so flat and underwhelming; I was left feeling really disappointed with the final outcome. It is such a shame because I am sure that the source material is worthy of a movie adaptation but this does not do justice to the story. A quick look at the history of Newton Knight shows that there are at least four books on the subject, so how they didn't manage to come up with a more cohesive script is somewhat of a surprise.
There may be a lot of conjecture across these books but with a bit of research they should have been able to decide on the story that they wanted to tell. Instead what we get is a film that goes too big on scope; whereas it would have been better served by narrowing the focus to possibly just the war years. I think they lost the core of the story which should have been about Jones County and instead made it more of a biography of Newton Knight.
The film is interspersed with historical photos from the Civil War detailing what events were occurring to help move the narrative along; this is used in place of a narrator. While this is a different way of showing the passage of time it does give the film a television movie of the week feel. There is generally no lead up to any of these time jumps either, they just seem to be thrown in at random when the director feels it is time to move to the next stage in Knight's life he wants us to see.
To confuse matters there is the completely unnecessary inclusion of a court case involving one of Knight's descendants Davis Knight. He is fighting for his marriage to be recognised as he is considered to be of African-American descent and at the time interracial marriage is still not recognised in the state of Mississippi. The scenes of this trial are also strewn in at irregular intervals throughout.
They have no effect on the main plot and only serve as a distraction to the story you want to see unfold. If I was editing this, these scenes would have ended up on the cutting room floor. It is merely an interesting footnote and could have been included as such in the end credits if they felt it necessary to bring the audience's attention to this matter.
As you can see there are a few gripes in regards to how disjointed the whole thing feels. On top of that we have the length of time the director wants to cover. It starts in 1862 and finishes, if you include Davis' story, in 1947! Of course it doesn't include all events during this period and I am exaggerating but it does show that they try to incorporate too many parts of the Knight family story.
The concentration should have stayed on the fourteen skirmishes Knight and his followers had with the Confederate forces in Jones County. Instead we have Knight establishing a farm after the war has finished; Knight's fight alongside his African-American friends to establish their right to vote; Knight's estranged wife returning to his farm; Knight rescuing Moses' son from a new form of slavery after abolition and finally Knight and the freedmen practicing their right to vote. It is just too much to fit in and makes the film just drag on and on, testing ones endurance.
Disappointed is the word that best sums up my feelings towards this, I hope that one day this interesting story gets a much better telling than what was on offer here.